The Role of the Implementation of National Building Regulations in the Fire Safety Improvement of Industrial Structures
Abstract
In this study, the fire risk level of the building and contents, occupants, and activities were calculated in a power plant control room using Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineering (FRAME). In the following, by assessing the existing situation, the effect of the implementation of national building regulations was determined on the reduction of fire risk level.
The result showed that the fire risk level for occupants (20.64), building and content (1.02) that are above the acceptable level and corrective measures and design changes should be applied to reduce the risk level. Also, in case of application of the third chapter of Iranian National Building Regulations in power plant construction, the fire risk level will be reduced by 11.7% compared to the existing situation
This study showed that the implementation of national building standards and regulation can provide the occupants life safety by correctly predicting escape routes. Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineering (FRAME) is a very effective tool for selecting the best control strategies for fire safety of industrial structures.
Keywords
References
Brauer RL. Safety and health for engineers. Second ed: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
WHO. A WHO plan for burn prevention and care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2008.
Ramachandran G. The Economics of Fire Protection.1 ed. London: E & FN Spon; 1998. 1-10.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, The third topic of national building regulations 2009.
Yarahmadi R, Gholizade A, Gafari M, Koohpayee A, Mahdinia M. Evaluation of the national regulations, building approach to fire safety in inpatient parts of a hospital. Iran Occupational Health Journal 2008; 6 (1): 28-36.
Jafari MJ, Haji Hoseini AR, Halvani GH, Mehrabi Y, MI Ghasemi. Prediction and Analysis of Human Errors in Operators of Control Rooms at 400 KV Posts and the Effectiveness of the Proposed Measures. Iran Occupational Health. 2012; 9 (7): 60-71.
Setare H, Koohpayee A, Nikpey A. Development of risk analysis in fire risk assessment, Conference: First National Conference on Safety in Ports, Tehran. 2005.
Smet E. FRAME 2008, Theoretical Basis and Technical Reference Guide, 2008, Accessed in 2013. [9] Ng M. Fire Risk Analysis of the Airport Terminals. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes. 2003; 5 (4): 103-07.
Charter S. The application of fire risk assessments in building design and management. Fire Protection Engineering 2013. Available from: http://www.sfpe.org/?page=2013_Q3_2
Shirali G, Yarahmadi R, Kazemi E. Determining the Risk of Fire by Engineering Approach and Provide Practical Protection Strategies (Case Study - A Thermal Power Plant). Iran Occupational Health Journal. 2015; 12 (5) :80-89
Sakenaite J. A Comparision of Methods Used For Fire Safety Evaluation. Civil and Transport Engineering. 2010; 2(6): 36-42.
Sakenaite J, Egidijus R. Fire Risk index and Fire Risk analysis: A Comparision of PROS and CONS, Conference: 10th international Conference on modern building, lithuania. 2010.
Ibrahim M, Mohddin A, Abdulhamid K, Yunu R, Yahya M. Fire risk assessment of heritage building-perspectives of regulatory authority. Procedia engineering. 2011; 20: 325-28.
Mahdinia M, Yarahmadi R, Gafari MG, Koohpayee A, Kazayee M. Fire Risk assessment and a plan of rescue, evacuation and reduce the amount of hospital care. Qom university of medical sciences. journal 2011; 5(3): 71-78.
Marberg A, frantzich H, Jonsson R, Lundin J, Rantat T. Practical Design and Performance Based Regulations.Fire Science &Technology. 1998;18 (1): 33-42.
Jonsson R, Lundin J. Fire Risk Design Based on Risk Assessment. Fire safety & Technology. 2000; 20(1):13-25.
Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment e-ISSN: :2345-5535 Iran university of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran